Search for: "J. SMITH, Supervisor" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 4:24 am by Andrew Frisch
Though a supervisor accompanied Smith during the doctor visits on a few days each quarter, by her own calculation Smith was unsupervised 95% of the time. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:02 am
 Highlights include:Lambretta v Teddy Smith, where Etherton J in the High Court ruled that there was no design right or copyright in the colourways of a track topJacobson & Sons v Globe GB was a trade mark case relating to the flash on the side of Gola shoes - the registrations were held by Etherton J to be valid and infringedIn Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG, Etherton LJ in the Court of Appeal gave the leading judgment rejecting the… [read post]
18 Mar 2006, 6:09 am
The matter is scheduled for appeal on April 3, 2006.- Garry J. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 8:40 am by D. Daxton White
Merrill Lynch supervisors approved Hammonds’ request to open a business account for B&J and failed to supervise funds that customers deposited and Hammonds withdrew. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:01 am
Merrill Lynch supervisors approved the Bandamp;J Partnership account and they failed to follow up. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
Smith, 19, shortly after the crash, which also killed a passenger in Smith's car. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:06 am by Andrew Frisch
J & J left the itinerary and order of Smith’s visits to the target doctors to her discretion. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:09 pm
Green repeatedly rejected Paul Smith's demands. h) Thereafter, Defendant David Smith spoke with Brown and demanded that Brown provide to David Smith private details and private information concerning the personal and intimate life of Plaintiff Patricia Green. i) Brown only informed David Smith that Plaintiff Patricia Green was dating Plaintiff White, but otherwise refused to divulge any information concerning Plaintiff Patricia Green. j) After daily… [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
The complaint also alleged that Basic Energy Services denied Smith, who worked for the company as a field disposal attendant, a promotion to field supervisor in 2006 because of her gender. [read post]